Uterine Artery Embolization
(UAE)

Uterine Fibroid Embolization
(UFE)

HomeSchedule an AppointmentFAQ
Risks and Side Effects:

Post Embolization Syndrome
(PES)

NOTICE: 
Adverse outcomes such as death, hysterectomy, ovarian failure, and radiation burns, are not being investigated or reported on.

To report an adverse outcome to your state medical board or to the FDA begin by submitting a Primary Complaint Intake Form. 


UAE/UFE FRS Cases:

Cory Cook

Achieng Wamabo


"Blowing the Whistle"
to the FDA:

UAE, UFE FDA Issues

Dr. Hufnagel's Letter to the FDA
5-22-2001

FDA and FTC Issues - sjb

read more


wpe2EB.jpg (23614 bytes)

Dr. Hufnagel has not practiced medicine in California since 1996.  Why then did the California Medical Board (CMB) sanction her in 1998? Why did they raid her home in 2001?

Has Dr. Hufnagel been attacked for "Blowing the Whistle" and speaking out about UAE?

Read what happened...
decide for yourself

 

 

 

 

 

 

Test at home for menopause.  click here

 

   The following was presented to the FDA on 5/22/2001:


THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FEMALE UTERUS
Vikki Hufnagel MD 5/22/2001 for the FDA Panel on UAE (UFE)

The general destruction of normal uterine tissue as a result of UAE has not been given significant status in the evaluation of this procedure.  I believe this stems directly from the culturalization that the uterus is an organ which we can eliminate with surgical easy (hysterectomy). And the value of the uterus is not held other than for childbearing in the majority belief system.

If you suspend your socialized concepts about the uterus and hold a position that the uterus has intrinsic physiological functions including but not limited to:

  • sexual response

  • creation of hormones and other substances
    (inhibin, relaxin, prostacyclins etal,) and

  • is an organ of placement for the pelvis

This concept of the human female uterus significantly impacts on the evaluation of said organ and its role in female anatomy and physiology.

I was and continue to be maliciously attacked by the American College of Obstetrics an Gynecology (ACOG), the CMB and by an appointed Judge for stating the uterus was a "sexual organ".  The manner in which my own career has been affected by stating my beliefs reflects the need of such institutions’ to protect their existing belief systems.

How you view this organ imports on who you treat it.

Also how you view women is impacted on how you treat them.  To often entrepreneurial medicine focuses on the fears of women and begins its sales campaign based on fear and ignorance.  Ignorance then is then feed with quick fixes and so called noninvasive treatments offering safe and effortless cures.

In the case of uterine fibroids I am able to say after more than 15 years of surgical experience that there are many approaches that are successful that are advanced over traditional myomectomy that remove uterine fibroids.  The standard surgical approach in general has not advanced in the world of gynecological surgery.  Rather than focus on learning new ways to remove uterine fibroids the  gynecological community has elected to support   entrepreneurial medicine such as UAE.  This is a political social reality that needs to be exposed.

POINT OF VIEW

Perhaps some analogy needs to be imposed within this discussion to try and demonstrate the absurdity of the approach that we are discussing here today.

A simple neoplasia ( non cancerous tumor ) of the testes can be treated with this UAE approach. Why are you not discussing here the occlusion of the vessels to the testes? Cutting of the blood supply to the neoplasia will cause it to shrink , to necrosis. Why is this not a topic here today?

These are all social issues in which we need to reevaluate our value system.

I find it appalling that the medical community has accepted the belief system that we can shut of the blood supply to uterus.  We can shrink fibroids but leave them in the uterus enlarged, scarred and inflamed and call this a cure.  It is my opinion that we are doing more harm when we destroy the anatomy and make surgical intervention more difficult in the future which is what occurs with all UAE cases.

The resulting necrosis of lieomyomata causes the capsule of the fibroid to bind and adhere to the normal myometrial tissue. In normal conditions the hard fibroid is distinctive from myometrial tissue and separated my a dense capsule.

The very thing that allows a surgeon to detect and remove uterine fibroid from the uterus ...is eliminated through the UAE process. UAE by the ischemia reaction causes significant loss of normal anatomical distinction. The myomertrial tissue is severely affected by UAE. The normal myometrial tissue becomes inflamed and damaged.

We are not dealing with an AV malformation in the cerebrum that is not accessible for surgery. We are dealing with benign tumors that can be easily extracted from the uterus. However the giant cell reaction, fibrosis, myometrial necrosis, histiocytic clumping, micro abscess formation within the normal myometrium make the surgical detection and removal of uterine fibroids extremely difficult even for the most skilled surgeon .

LACK OF SURGICAL EXPERTISE

The lack of training in the removal of uterine fibroids is an issue with in this nation. Many surgeons will be forced to perform hysterectomies on post UAE patients because of the anatomical changes that take place throughout the uterus.

Separation between the necrotic degenerating fibroids and the myometrium which has become inflamed and reactive to the necrosis is not easily delineated. The capsules of the fibroids become like super glue to the normal myometrial tissue.

I wonder how many women with a single fibroid tumor that was not symptomatic have undergone UAE. These women are excellent surgical candidates for tumor removal. The reality with new surgical approaches the number of tumors or size of tumors are not issues with reconstructive processes.

Women are not being fully informed that the likely hood of complete necrosis of their tumors in many cases is not possible. They are then further not told that they are at higher risk for a hysterectomy or a very difficult myomectomy. Many of the small seed fibroids will not be detected at surgery and re-growth is likely.

FAST

I asked Acheing Wamabo to describe her UAE in one word. She looked up at me and said "FAST". She was given no time to ask questions. She was not given adequate consent which seems to be a consistent complaint with this procedure.

Women are not been adequately informed of the negative affects . I have reviewed this case and it is present as a typical UAE. This patient was given Lupron to shrink her tumors before the UAE. She had a pulmonary emboli shower from the Lupron. This negative out come with Lupron was never reported. Many woman with negative Lupron experiences have no idea this can be reported. Worse, their physicians are not reporting these events.

I will be attacked for reporting this case and issue. No good deed goes unpunished has been the hallmark of my career. The physicians involved in Ms. Wambos case are leaders in the UAE movement ( Roxborgouh Hospital Penn.).

Her PE was in 1998. It is not referred to in any of her UAE records. The radiologist denied being told about it. The Achieng states she discussed this repeatedly because she nearly died. She has two official UAE operative reports in her file. One that states both right and left arteries where blocked . One that states on the left side was blocked. She had no follow up at all. No one performed a follow up ultrasound. No one dealt with the fact that she was still walking around with a massive size uterus with severe pressure and reoccurring right sided pains. She was living in fear of having any surgery told it could not be done because of her prior pulmonary emboli. The lack of evaluation and follow up in this patient needs to be seen as the trend in the FAST MILL sales development of UAE that has become the standard of care.

There was also an attempt to have Achieng seen by a surgeon who would remove her uterus and not report any of these findings. The physician involved with her LUPRON PE refused this woman her own records.This physician refused her records to myself. The records showed that there was no ultrasound follow up for two years. Trying to care for this woman was difficult to say the least.  Her referring gyn had no files and no memory of her. She will be filing a FDA Device report and a report on Lupron.

I have had more than ten women this year tell me similar stories about their UAE. None of them had the negative outcomes reported. None of them knew about reporting. The data being report is very none representative . follow up has vanished . I see this as another abusive technology .

IS THIS ANOTHER OVA BLOC ...silence

What happened to the thousands of women injected under FDA studies with silicone in their fallopian tubes with the OVA BLOC fiasco. A conspiracy of silence develops around these issues.

CONCERNS:

RADIATION EXPOSURE

Radiation exposure to the female for a non life threatening condition I feel is to great. I am concerned about the long term affects of radiation on the ovaries.

I am aware that we have technology to avoid this today. Visualization does not require radiation.

TOXIN EXPOSURE

The Polyvinyl family is linked with toxic exposure and complications. These agents are linked with hormonal changes that may be related to development of female cancer.

LACK of FULL DISCLOSURE

The surrent documents and oral discussions with potential patents do not fully explain the unknowns of UAE and the known complications that have been witnessed.  This area is lacking in adequate disclosure

FOLLOW UP

The rush to get these women into UAE is part of the extensive marketing program that’s taken place. However, the follow up care is lacking .

Vikki Hufnagel MD
323 650 6182  update - current number is now 323-874-5530

                                      

Notice to the FDA:  Call to Halt All UAE


Susan Bucher

Director www.tubal.org
815 834-0987

To the UAE Panel and the FDA

I am formally requesting that UAE be stopped until such time that a complete retrospective study is done looking at outcome:

  • Hysterectomy
  • Ovarian function
  • Radiation exposure
  • Uterine size evaluation
  • Toxin evaluation
  • All complications
  • Full disclosure of the industry funding

Under the Freedom of Information act , I and others will begin a national retrospective study since it appears that the concerns of women are not being listened to.

Thank you,
Susan J Bucher

5/22/2001


Special Thanks to:

Nora Coffey, of the HERS Foundation.
Her speech to the FDA and the UAE (UFE) Panel was poignant and moving, as she is also in direct contact with thousands of women seeking answers, information, and alternatives to hysterectomy.

Dr. Vikki Hufnagel -
Medical Expert, Women's Health Rights Activist

Susan J Bucher - www.Tubal.org

 


View Products | Schedule an Appointment | The FRS Center | Calendar | Legal Reviews and Consults | Links


Copyright 2005 © Dr. Vikki Hufnagel.
All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy